Products
Get the Headband
Leveraging EEG for ADHD diagnosis and treatment
November 17, 2024.
Blog Image

By Abbie Bull, University of Birmingham, in collaboration with Naxon Labs


ADHD (Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder) is a complex neurodevelopmental condition affecting millions of individuals worldwide. Traditional diagnostic methods often rely on subjective assessments, leaving room for variability in interpretation. Recent advancements in neuroscience, particularly in EEG (electroencephalography) technology, have opened new pathways for objective analysis. This article delves into the use of EEG to analyze brainwave activity—specifically theta and beta waves—offering a deeper understanding of ADHD's neurobiological underpinnings and presenting innovative approaches for improving diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes.

 

Introduction: The Neural Marker of ADHD – Theta/Beta Ratio

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a complex neurodevelopmental condition characterized by inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. One promising avenue for understanding and diagnosing ADHD lies in electroencephalography (EEG), which provides a window into brain activity patterns. Specifically, the theta/beta ratio (TBR) has emerged as a neural marker of ADHD. Theta waves (4–8 Hz) are associated with drowsiness and inattention, while beta waves (13–30 Hz) correlate with active thinking and focus. Individuals with ADHD often exhibit an elevated TBR, where theta waves outnumber beta waves, reflecting a reduced capacity for sustained attention.

Clarke et al., 2011


Methodology: A Protocol to Analyze EEG Data

The primary goal of this study was to design and evaluate a protocol to detect ADHD-related patterns using EEG data collected with Naxon Labs' Explorer tool and Muse headbands. The protocol included:

  1. Baseline and Task Recording: Participants completed a baseline resting phase followed by a Go/No-Go task, a cognitive test commonly used to assess attention and impulse control. The Go/No-Go task is often used in psychology to measure an individual's cognitive abilities such as impulse control, attention, and reaction time. In this task the participant must refrain from performing an action when a visual stimulus tells them not to do, for example avoid pressing the space bar when the screen is red. Whilst wearing the Naxon Muse EEG headband, the participant completes a 5-minute period of baseline resting activity before moving on to complete a series of Go/No-Go trials. We
    analyse the wave frequency in Naxon Explorer to see whether there appears to be a drastic difference in ratio between the theta and beta activity at baseline and during the trial. The EEG data is filtered to identify artefacts such as blinks and clenches which may disrupt the electrical activity recorded. 

  2. Data Analysis:

    • EEG signals were processed to extract theta and beta wave activity using Naxon Explorer.
    • The theta/beta ratio was calculated for specific electrodes (AF7, AF8, TP9, TP10) using statistical tools like Excel and SPSS.
    • Visual and statistical comparisons were made between baseline and task-related activity.
  3. Thresholds for Interpretation:

    • A TBR above 2 suggests ADHD-related patterns.
    • Ratios between 1.2 and 2 indicate typical brain activity.
    • A TBR below 1.2 reflects balanced neural activity, not consistent with ADHD.

Findings: Distinct Neural Patterns

Predictions -
- If there are symptoms of ADHD, the brain activity should be dominated by theta waves. This should be more pronounced in the Go/No-Go task than in the baseline. 
- If the brain activity is typical, the beta waves should be more pronounced to show the brain is engaging in attentional control.  

Findings - 
- For regions AF7 and AF8 it appears the activity is not dominated by theta waves, more so by beta waves. Whereas for regions TP9 and TP10, the theta activity is much greater than beta activity. 
 

ADHD Naxon Labs

ADHD markers with Naxon Labs

Visual Analysis:

Statistical Analysis:


Limitations and Future Directions

 

Challenges with EEG-Based Diagnosis:

  1. Variability: The TBR may fluctuate with age, development, and individual differences.
  2. Overlap with Other Conditions: Similar brainwave patterns can appear in anxiety or other neuropsychiatric disorders.
  3. False Positives/Negatives: Variability in EEG data can lead to diagnostic inaccuracies.

 

Critiques of the theory:

* Inconsistencies 🡪 not all studies have consistently found an elevated TBR in individuals with ADHD. The variability might be due to differences in study methodologies, participant characteristics, or EEG recording and analysis techniques.

* Age and Development 🡪 the Theta/Beta ratio can change with age, and some of the differences observed might be related to developmental stages rather than ADHD.

* Specificity and Sensitivity 🡪 there is ongoing debate about the specificity and sensitivity of TBR as a diagnostic tool. While it can indicate differences in brainwave activity, it might not be sufficient on its own for a definitive ADHD diagnosis without considering clinical assessments and other diagnostic criteria.

 

Critiques of using EEG:

* Overlap with Other Conditions 🡪 brainwave patterns observed in ADHD can also be seen in other conditions such as anxiety. This lack of specificity means that an EEG-based diagnosis might lead to misdiagnosis if not corroborated by other clinical assessments

* False Positives/Negatives 🡪 EEG-based methods may produce false positives (diagnosing ADHD when it’s not present) or false negatives (failing to diagnose ADHD when it is present). This could be due to the inherent variability in EEG data or the influence of external factors like fatigue, stress, or medication. 

* Symptom Variability 🡪 ADHD is a highly heterogeneous disorder, meaning it manifests differently in different individuals. EEG patterns that may correlate with ADHD in one person might not apply to another, making it difficult to develop a universal EEG-based diagnostic criterion.
 

 

Enhancing Accuracy with AI:

Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) with EEG analysis offers a pathway to address these challenges. AI can detect subtle trends in noisy data, adapt models as new data becomes available, and provide personalized insights for both diagnosis and treatment. This approach could revolutionize ADHD management by offering tailored interventions such as neurofeedback.

There is evidently complications with the traditional approach to diagnosing ADHD which EEG can counteract. However, more still can be done to ensure diagnosis is robust and accurate across universal populations…
Using AI, biomarkers of ADHD can be detected from noisy EEG data and transformed into meaningful trends and patterns often missed by the human eye.  
As more EEG data is collected from patients, AI models can be continuously refined. Machine learning techniques can be used to update the models as new data comes in, ensuring that the diagnostic tool remains up-to-date with the latest understanding of ADHD.
Clinicians and researchers can provide feedback on the AI’s performance, leading to iterative improvements in the model’s accuracy and reliability.
However extremely large sample sizes are needed to establish a tool which is not confounded by demographic characteristics such as co-morbid conditions. 

Diagnosis is not the only focus! Combining AI with EEG can lead to the development of personalised treatment plans for patients with ADHD. Based on their individual patterns of brain activity, interventions such as neurofeedback can be tailored to help patients manage their symptoms.

 


Ethical Considerations

As technology advances, integrating tools like EEG and AI into ADHD diagnosis and treatment raises important ethical questions. One concern is the increasing reliance on technology in clinical practice. Some clinicians argue that while these tools provide valuable insights, they should not replace the human element of diagnosis and treatment, which includes understanding the patient's lived experience and context.

Looking ahead, the potential for EEG and AI to autonomously diagnose and implement treatment plans sparks debate. While such innovations could streamline healthcare delivery, they also raise questions about the role of clinicians and the ethical implications of relying on machines to make critical health decisions.

Another contentious issue is the ability to "read minds" through brain imaging techniques like EEG. This raises concerns about privacy and consent, as participants may be wary of how their neural data could be interpreted or used beyond the intended scope of diagnosis.

Lastly, the uneven accessibility to advanced diagnostic tools poses significant challenges. Socioeconomic disparities may limit access to EEG and AI-based solutions, leading to unequal opportunities for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment. Addressing these ethical concerns is crucial to ensure that technological advancements in ADHD care are implemented responsibly and equitably.

.


A Step Toward More Accurate ADHD Diagnostics

This project underscores the potential of EEG technology, particularly the theta/beta ratio, as a tool for understanding ADHD. While there are limitations, the integration of advanced analytics, such as AI, could enhance the reliability and applicability of these findings. The work conducted during this project represents an important foundation for further research and development in ADHD diagnostics and personalized treatment.

For researchers, clinicians, and technologists, this collaboration between Naxon Labs and the University of Birmingham highlights the power of interdisciplinary innovation in addressing complex neurological conditions.


About the Author

Abbie Bull is a Psychology student at the University of Birmingham. During her internship with Naxon Labs, she explored the potential of EEG-based diagnostics for ADHD, contributing to groundbreaking research in neurotechnology.